A GUIDE TO THE EUROPEAN PROPOSAL
The EU KIDS Act,
explained.
Age-appropriate access. Safer digital experiences.
Stronger protection for children online.
Understand what the proposal means for games, social platforms and AI services—and how age assurance, parental consent and privacy fit together.
The legal status
This is a legislative proposal, COM(2026) 681 final, 2026/0286(COD). The European Parliament and Council must consider it before it can become law. The dates and obligations below describe the proposed text, not duties already created by KIDS. Existing DSA, GDPR and other applicable obligations continue.
The proposed age rules
| Service | Proposed approach | Key reference |
|---|---|---|
| Risk-triggered social and video services | Independent accounts from 15. Limited guardian-created accounts for ages 13–14, with guardian tools always active, a maximum of one hour per day and contact controls. | Article 6 |
| Child-specific video services | A narrow exception for ages 3–12 through the guardian’s own account, subject to impact assessment, protective features and a one-hour daily ceiling. | Article 7 |
| Online games | Under-13 access must be enabled and controlled through guardian tools. The social-account ban is not automatically the gaming rule. | Article 15 |
| AI companions and general chatbots | Under-13 access through guardian tools, plus child-specific design and evaluation requirements. | Article 14 |
Safety remains relevant after entry
Article 8 proposes protective design by default. Covered providers would derogate from these defaults only after establishing adulthood through the applicable age-assurance route. Different articles specify the controls for different service categories.
For social and video services, Articles 9–13 address compulsive use, recommendations, safe settings, contact and transactions. Article 15 incorporates selected provisions for games. Article 14 sets requirements for covered AI systems. The obligations therefore depend on the service’s functions.
Timing and existing accounts
Article 43 proposes general application six months after entry into force, with exceptions for Articles 5, 33 and 35. Entry into force would follow Official Journal publication by 20 days. These are relative draft periods; there is no fixed KIDS compliance date yet.
Article 6(4) proposes checks of existing accounts within six months after application. Article 32 contains high-confidence exceptions. Existing under-15 accounts and accounts whose age cannot be established face disabling under Article 6(4); a compliant guardian-created route needs separate handling.
What it means for you
Parents
Understand age rules, guardian tools and your child’s privacy.
Public authorities
Connect public proofs with inclusive, measurable service adoption.
Game developers
Translate Article 15 into product and backend controls.
AI providers
Address memory, dependency risks and deliberate activation.
Social platforms
Prepare account workflows, safer feeds and guardian-tool integration.
Identity, permission and protection
TRUSTED FACTS
Age assurance and eIDAS
European digital identity provides a foundation for proving relevant attributes with minimum disclosure.
FAMILY CHOICES
Parental consent
Guardians can make specific decisions about permitted services and features, within the applicable legal rules.
CONTINUOUS SUPPORT
A 360° approach
Access controls work alongside safer design, learning, contextual protection and trusted routes to help.
Official texts
Read the Commission proposal and accompanying documents · All legal sources